openrs2
/
openrs2-natives
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 19 Pull Requests Releases Activity
Open-source replacements for the jaggl, jaggl_dri and jagmisc native libraries
You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
75 Commits
1 Branch
2 Tags
1.1 MiB
Tag: Branch: Tree: b8b2492ac0
Branches Tags
${ item.name }
Create tag ${ searchTerm }
Create branch ${ searchTerm }
from 'b8b2492ac0'
${ noResults }
openrs2-natives/gl-dri-natives/pom.xml

45 lines
1.3 KiB
Raw Normal View History Unescape

Add JNI header files generated from jaggl and jagmisc A long-term goal is to write clean room implementations of these libraries, for several reasons: * The original libraries are missing, so we currently have to do a fair amount of awkward bytecode patching in the loader to use JOGL instead. * The original libraries were not compiled for 64-bit Linux. We might also want to compile for new architectures (e.g. ARM or RISC-V) or additional operating systems (e.g. the BSDs). * I'm worried that over time the libraries will bit rot and might eventually stop working with modern JREs - it's already been about 10 years since they were originally compiled! I'm not too concerned about putting this in the main open-source repository: I think it's generally believed that interfaces are not copyrightable, and we're only copying the interface for interoperability purposes. The native code will be original. Furthermore, most of the jaggl interface is just a copy of the OpenGL interface, so it's unlikely that Jagex could claim they hold the copyright on it anyway.
5 years ago
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<parent>
<groupId>dev.openrs2</groupId>
Add openrs2-natives parent POM
5 years ago
<artifactId>openrs2-natives</artifactId>
Add JNI header files generated from jaggl and jagmisc A long-term goal is to write clean room implementations of these libraries, for several reasons: * The original libraries are missing, so we currently have to do a fair amount of awkward bytecode patching in the loader to use JOGL instead. * The original libraries were not compiled for 64-bit Linux. We might also want to compile for new architectures (e.g. ARM or RISC-V) or additional operating systems (e.g. the BSDs). * I'm worried that over time the libraries will bit rot and might eventually stop working with modern JREs - it's already been about 10 years since they were originally compiled! I'm not too concerned about putting this in the main open-source repository: I think it's generally believed that interfaces are not copyrightable, and we're only copying the interface for interoperability purposes. The native code will be original. Furthermore, most of the jaggl interface is just a copy of the OpenGL interface, so it's unlikely that Jagex could claim they hold the copyright on it anyway.
5 years ago
<version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<artifactId>openrs2-gl-dri-natives</artifactId>
Add jaggl_dri implementation
5 years ago
<packaging>nar</packaging>
Add JNI header files generated from jaggl and jagmisc A long-term goal is to write clean room implementations of these libraries, for several reasons: * The original libraries are missing, so we currently have to do a fair amount of awkward bytecode patching in the loader to use JOGL instead. * The original libraries were not compiled for 64-bit Linux. We might also want to compile for new architectures (e.g. ARM or RISC-V) or additional operating systems (e.g. the BSDs). * I'm worried that over time the libraries will bit rot and might eventually stop working with modern JREs - it's already been about 10 years since they were originally compiled! I'm not too concerned about putting this in the main open-source repository: I think it's generally believed that interfaces are not copyrightable, and we're only copying the interface for interoperability purposes. The native code will be original. Furthermore, most of the jaggl interface is just a copy of the OpenGL interface, so it's unlikely that Jagex could claim they hold the copyright on it anyway.
5 years ago
<name>OpenRS2 GL DRI Natives</name>
Improve <description> wrapping
5 years ago
<description>
Reimplementation of the jaggl_dri native library, which implements the DRI
hack to support the open-source Mesa drivers on UNIX systems.
Format *.xml files with IDEA's code style
5 years ago
</description>
Add license I was torn for a long time over whether to license under the GPL or AGPL. I've settled on the GPL as I think it'd be quite hard to enforce the AGPL (because of the nature of the RuneScape private server community), and honest people would be at a disadvantage compared to people who would ignore the additional provisions of the AGPL. The *-natives modules are licensed under the LGPL as they are intended to be linked with the proprietary client software, so the GPL would not be appropriate. I've decided to use v3 (and only v3) of the GPL. I don't like the 'or later' clause as it means placing a great deal of trust in the FSF not to change the overall intention of the license in future versions.
5 years ago
<licenses>
<license>
Change GPL v3 -> v3.0 This is just to clarify that the intention is that only the original v3 license is acceptable.
5 years ago
<name>GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0</name>
Add license I was torn for a long time over whether to license under the GPL or AGPL. I've settled on the GPL as I think it'd be quite hard to enforce the AGPL (because of the nature of the RuneScape private server community), and honest people would be at a disadvantage compared to people who would ignore the additional provisions of the AGPL. The *-natives modules are licensed under the LGPL as they are intended to be linked with the proprietary client software, so the GPL would not be appropriate. I've decided to use v3 (and only v3) of the GPL. I don't like the 'or later' clause as it means placing a great deal of trust in the FSF not to change the overall intention of the license in future versions.
5 years ago
<url>https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.txt</url>
</license>
</licenses>
Add jaggl_dri implementation
5 years ago
Stop building OS-specific modules on all systems They were only built on all systems for the benefit of the site plugin, but I'm not intending to use that any more.
5 years ago
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>com.github.maven-nar</groupId>
<artifactId>nar-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<linker>
<sysLibs>
<sysLib>
<type>shared</type>
<name>dl</name>
</sysLib>
</sysLibs>
</linker>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Add JNI header files generated from jaggl and jagmisc A long-term goal is to write clean room implementations of these libraries, for several reasons: * The original libraries are missing, so we currently have to do a fair amount of awkward bytecode patching in the loader to use JOGL instead. * The original libraries were not compiled for 64-bit Linux. We might also want to compile for new architectures (e.g. ARM or RISC-V) or additional operating systems (e.g. the BSDs). * I'm worried that over time the libraries will bit rot and might eventually stop working with modern JREs - it's already been about 10 years since they were originally compiled! I'm not too concerned about putting this in the main open-source repository: I think it's generally believed that interfaces are not copyrightable, and we're only copying the interface for interoperability purposes. The native code will be original. Furthermore, most of the jaggl interface is just a copy of the OpenGL interface, so it's unlikely that Jagex could claim they hold the copyright on it anyway.
5 years ago
</project>