|
|
@ -111,8 +111,9 @@ public class ClassRangeType extends MyType { |
|
|
|
ClassDeclaration c2 = new ClassDeclaration(top.getClassName()); |
|
|
|
ClassDeclaration c2 = new ClassDeclaration(top.getClassName()); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try { |
|
|
|
try { |
|
|
|
if (c1.getClassDefinition(env).superClassOf(env, c2) || |
|
|
|
if (c2.getClassDefinition(env).isInterface() |
|
|
|
c1.getClassDefinition(env).implementedBy(env, c2)) |
|
|
|
|| c1.getClassDefinition(env).superClassOf(env, c2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|| c1.getClassDefinition(env).implementedBy(env, c2)) |
|
|
|
return new ClassRangeType(bottom, top); |
|
|
|
return new ClassRangeType(bottom, top); |
|
|
|
} catch (ClassNotFound ex) { |
|
|
|
} catch (ClassNotFound ex) { |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
|
} |
|
|
@ -183,20 +184,18 @@ public class ClassRangeType extends MyType { |
|
|
|
* I currently only handle the simple case where one of the |
|
|
|
* I currently only handle the simple case where one of the |
|
|
|
* two objects implements the other or is a child of it. |
|
|
|
* two objects implements the other or is a child of it. |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* Forget the following setences, java tells us if the local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* is an interface or an object. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* There are really complicated cases that are currently |
|
|
|
* There are really complicated cases that are currently |
|
|
|
* ignored: imaging, c1 and c2 are both disjunct interfaces |
|
|
|
* ignored: imaging, c1 and c2 are both disjunct interfaces |
|
|
|
* and there are some object which implements them both. |
|
|
|
* and there are some object which implements them both. |
|
|
|
* There is no way for us to guess which. |
|
|
|
* There is no way for us to guess which. |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Another possibility is that c1 is an interface and c2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* an Object that doesn't implement c1. This is not an error, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* because it may be a sub class of c1 and c2 that implements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* c1 and c2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* What can we do about this? We probably need something more |
|
|
|
* What can we do about this? We probably need something more |
|
|
|
* powerful than a simple class range. |
|
|
|
* powerful than a simple class range. |
|
|
|
* But maybe this isn't needed at all. How should someone |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* use an object which implements two interfaces in a local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* variable without casting? The information which object |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* to use must be somewhere in the method. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* But think of this code fragment: |
|
|
|
* But think of this code fragment: |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
@ -337,9 +336,12 @@ public class ClassRangeType extends MyType { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type newType = createRangeType(bottom,top); |
|
|
|
Type newType = createRangeType(bottom,top); |
|
|
|
if (newType == tError) { |
|
|
|
if (newType == tError) { |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
boolean oldTypeDebugging = Decompiler.isTypeDebugging; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decompiler.isTypeDebugging = true; |
|
|
|
System.err.println("intersecting "+ this +" and "+ type + |
|
|
|
System.err.println("intersecting "+ this +" and "+ type + |
|
|
|
" to <" + bottom + "-" + top + |
|
|
|
" to <" + bottom + "-" + top + |
|
|
|
"> to <error>"); |
|
|
|
"> to <error>"); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decompiler.isTypeDebugging = oldTypeDebugging; |
|
|
|
Thread.dumpStack(); |
|
|
|
Thread.dumpStack(); |
|
|
|
} else if (Decompiler.isTypeDebugging) { |
|
|
|
} else if (Decompiler.isTypeDebugging) { |
|
|
|
System.err.println("intersecting "+ this +" and "+ type + |
|
|
|
System.err.println("intersecting "+ this +" and "+ type + |
|
|
|