I'm currently working on a CreateResponse class, which is even more
distinct from LoginResponse - so I've decided to separate it. For
consistency, separating the JS5 login responses seems sensible too.
Signed-off-by: Graham <gpe@openrs2.org>
I've also removed the comment - I'm going to have to do something
similar for CREATE_DOWNSTREAM, and I think it's a bit more obvious with
the more distinctive name.
This allows us to deal with a single corner case of the same opcode
being used for two slightly different login response packets, depending
on the request.
I'm still not particularly happy with this: if the JS5 download
finishes before HTTP, it'll time out and kill the whole process.
Similarly, because it takes so long to import the indexes and as we
can't fetch groups in parallel with that, it can often time out early
during the process.
In the long term, I think I am going to try and move most of the logic
outside of the Netty threads and communicate between threads with queues
or channels. This would also allow us to run multiple JS5 clients in
parallel.
The code also needs some tidying up, particularly constants in the
Js5ChannelHandler constructors.
Signed-off-by: Graham <gpe@openrs2.org>
Graham