Add support for deobfuscating the unsigned signlink simultaneously with the signed signlink #114

I think this is probably achievable with the new class name prefixing code, it'd just need some code for ensuring the methods/fields are kept in the same inherited method/field sets. Class names would need some similar disjoint set code too.

After having taken a look at the unsigned signlink, I'm not particular interested in doing this. It appears to be virtually identical to the signed signlink, just with a lot of the code stripped out (presumably with a C preprocessor).

This makes it very similar to the SD client, which I'm not that interested in for similar reasons.

It'd also be a pain to keep the names in the signed/unsigned signlinks in sync when refactoring, as javac can only resolve class/method/field references to one of them - not both.

Therefore, I don't think I'll bother with this.