openrs2
/
openrs2
3
1
Fork 3
Code Issues 124 Pull Requests Releases Activity
Labels Milestones
New Issue

Move packclass implementation to a separate module? #129

Open
opened 3 years ago by gpe · 0 comments
gpe commented 3 years ago
Owner

Might be tricky, as I think there might be circular dependencies between packclass and the rest of asm.

Might be tricky, as I think there might be circular dependencies between packclass and the rest of asm.
gpe added the
asm
 label 3 years ago
gpe added the
improvement
 label 3 years ago
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
bzip2
master
Labels
Apply labels
Clear labels
archive
Related to the archiving service asm
Related to the ASM utility module buffer
Related to the buffer library bug
A bug build
Related to the build infrastructure cache
Related to the cache library compression
Related to the compression module crypto
Related to the cryptography module deobfuscator
Related to deobfuscation (at both the bytecode- and AST-level) or decompilation docs
Related to the documentation stored in the repository feature
A new feature improvement
An improvement to an existing feature, such as refactoring, documenting or adding tests patcher
Related to client patching protocol
Related to the protocol module research
Requires further research before progress can be made util
Related to the common utility module or the YAML module
No Label archive asm buffer bug build cache compression crypto deobfuscator docs feature improvement patcher protocol research util
Milestone
Set milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No Milestone
Assignees
Assign users
Clear assignees
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: openrs2/openrs2#129
Write Preview
Loading…
Cancel
Save
There is no content yet.
Delete Branch '%!s(<nil>)'

Deleting a branch is permanent. It CANNOT be undone. Continue?

No
Yes