Investigate ForgeFlower patches #91

Open
opened 4 years ago by gpe · 4 comments
gpe commented 4 years ago
Owner

https://github.com/MinecraftForge/ForgeFlower/tree/master/FernFlower-Patches

Some of these are really good - e.g. the try/finally one fixed the problem we had in the client.

There are probably many we want to incorporate into our own fork - perhaps most or even all of them?

https://github.com/MinecraftForge/ForgeFlower/tree/master/FernFlower-Patches Some of these are really good - e.g. the try/finally one fixed the problem we had in the client. There are probably many we want to incorporate into our own fork - perhaps most or even all of them?
gpe added the
research
deobfuscator
labels 4 years ago
Poster
Owner
https://github.com/MinecraftForge/ForgeFlower/blob/master/FernFlower-Patches/0033-Do-not-hide-empty-constructors-that-change-access-le.patch would be nice, but it doesn't apply cleanly.
Poster
Owner

Not part of Forgeflower, but would be useful: a9d4df1567

or is that best done in the AST transformer?

Not part of Forgeflower, but would be useful: https://github.com/Velocity-/fernflower-improved/commit/a9d4df156783edc3ad8375f3e9d0ebfd3f1e4e45 or is that best done in the AST transformer?
Poster
Owner

would be nice, but it doesn't apply cleanly.

that's because our newer version of Fernflower already has an equivalent change!

> would be nice, but it doesn't apply cleanly. that's because our newer version of Fernflower already has an equivalent change!
Poster
Owner
https://github.com/MinecraftForge/ForgeFlower/blob/master/FernFlower-Patches/0034-Revert-change-to-FieldExprent-getExprentUse.patch is another one to try
Sign in to join this conversation.
Loading…
There is no content yet.